🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president declaring the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries used their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The US president recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the primary resolution to settle disagreements, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this assault."